Wednesday, 30 January 2013

United Nations Global Compact - UNGC


The United Nations Global Compact, also known as Compact or UNGC, is a United Nations initiative to encourage businesses worldwide to adopt sustainable and socially responsible policies, and to report on their implementation. The Global Compact is a principle-based framework for businesses, stating ten principles in the areas of human rights, labour, the environment and anti-corruption. Under the Compact, companies are brought together with UN agencies, labour groups and civil society.

The Global Compact is the world's largest corporate citizenship initiative with two objectives: "Mainstream the ten principles in business activities around the world" and "Catalyse actions in support of broader UN goals, such as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)."

The Compact was announced by the then UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in an address to The World Economic Forum on January 31, 1999, and was officially launched at UN Headquarters in New York on July 26, 2000.

The Global Compact Office is supported by six UN agencies: the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; the United Nations Environment Programme; the International Labour Organization; the United Nations Development Programme; the United Nations Industrial Development Organization; and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

The Ten Principles

Human Rights

Businesses should:
Principle 1: Support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
Principle 2: Make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses.

Labour Standards

Businesses should uphold:
Principle 3: the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;
Principle 4: the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;
Principle 5: the effective abolition of child labour; and
Principle 6: the elimination of discrimination in employment and occupation.

Environment

Businesses should:
Principle 7: support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;
Principle 8: undertake initiatives to promote environmental responsibility; and
Principle 9: encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.

Anti-Corruption
Principle 10: Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery.

ISO 14000


ISO 14000 is a family of standards related to environmental management that exists to help organizations (1) minimize how their operations (processes etc.) negatively affect the environment (i.e. cause adverse changes to air, water, or land); (2) comply with applicable laws, regulations, and other environmentally oriented requirements, and (3) continually improve in the above.

ISO 14000 is similar to ISO 9000 quality management in that both pertain to the process of how a product is produced, rather than to the product itself. As with ISO 9000, certification is performed by third-party organizations rather than being awarded by ISO directly. The ISO 19011 audit standard applies when auditing for both 9000 and 14000 compliance at once.

The requirements of ISO 14000 are an integral part of the European Union‘s Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS). EMAS‘s structure and material requirements are more demanding, foremost concerning performance improvement, legal compliance and reporting duties.

The concept of an environmental management system evolved in the early nineties and its origin can be traced back to 1972, when the United Nations organized a Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) was launched (Corbett & Kirsch, 2001). These early initiatives led to the establishment of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) and the adoption of the Montreal Protocol and Basel Convention.

In 1992, the first Earth Summit was held in Rio-de-Janeiro (Jiang & Bansal, 2001), which served to generate a global commitment to the environment. This developed the template for the development of the ISO 14000 series in 1996, by the International Organization for Standardization, which has representation from committees all over the world (ISO). As of 2010, ISO 14001 is now used by at least 223 149 organizations in 159 countries and economies.

ISO 14001 standard

ISO 14001 sets out the criteria for an environmental management system. It does not state requirements for environmental performance, but maps out a framework that a company or organization can follow to set up an effective environmental management system. It can be used by any organization that wants to improve resource efficiency, reduce waste and drive down costs. Using ISO 14001 can provide assurance to company management and employees as well as external stakeholders that environmental impact is being measured and improved. ISO 14001 can also be integrated with other management functions and assists companies in meeting their environmental and economic goals.

ISO 14001, as with other ISO 14000 standards, is voluntary (IISD 2010), with its main aim to assist companies in continually improving their environmental performance, whilst complying with any applicable legislation. Organizations are responsible for setting their own targets and performance measures, with the standard serving to assist them in meeting objectives and goals and the subsequent monitoring and measurement of these (IISD 2010).

Rather than focusing on exact measures and goals of environmental performance, the standard highlights what an organization needs to do to meet these goals (IISD 2010). Success of the system is very dependant on commitment from all levels of the organization, especially top management, who need to be actively involved in the development, implementation and maintenance of the environmental management system.

ISO 14001 is known as a generic management system standard, meaning that it is relevant to any organization seeking to improve and manage resources more effectively. This includes: single site to large multi-national companies, high risk companies to low risk service organizations, manufacturing, process and the service industries; including local governments, all industry sectors including public and private sectors, original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers.

All standards are periodically reviewed by ISO to ensure they still meet market requirements. The current version of ISO 14001 – ISO 14001:2004 is under review as of April 2012.

Basic principles and methodology

Plan – establish objectives and processes required

Do – implement the processes

Check – measure and monitor the processes and report results

Act – take action to improve performance of EMS based on results

Continual Improvement Process

The core requirement of a continual improvement process (CIP) is different from the one known from quality management systems. CIP in ISO 14001 has three dimensions:  

Expansion: More and more business areas get covered by the implemented EMS.

Enrichment: More and more activities, products, processes, emissions, resources etc. get managed by the implemented EMS.

Upgrading: An improvement of the structural and organizational framework of the EMS, as well as an accumulation of know-how in dealing with business related environmental issues.

Overall, the CIP-concept expects the organization to gradually move away from merely operational environmental measures towards a strategic approach on how to deal with environmental challenges.

The Companies Bill and corporate-social responsibility (CSR)



The Companies Bill has been approved by the Lok Sabha. It is a vast Bill. It covers everything and replaces the earlier Companies Act of 1956. Watch the video:

In an interview to CNBC-TV18, Hitesh Jain, partner at ALMT Legal speaks about the Companies Bill and gives his outlook going forward. Below is the edited transcript of his interview with CNBC-TV18's Latha Venkatesh and Ekta Batra.

Q: What are the implications on the P&L and the balance sheets of companies? The corporate-social responsibility (CSR) expenditure now is nearly being mandated at 2 percent. I understand the wording is not mandatory, but companies may spend. Yet a board member will have to be in a committee, which will monitor this expense and give credible explanations, if that 2 percent is not met. Will this, therefore, begin to impact the P&L in some fashion?

A: There are two very important provisions in the clause. The first clause is that the board is mandated to ensure that the company will spend on the CSR. Second thing is that they have to give their explanation. So, effectively although there is no mandatory obligation on the company, but a responsibility is cast upon the board members.

Added with the responsibility, to give the explanation for non-implementation or implementation makes it mandatory. When you are not able to give a satisfactory explanation about not spending on CSR activities then the regulator will certainly have a power to question the roles and responsibility of the directors. So, effectively it gives a teeth, it is not just a provision on the paper, but it puts an obligation on the board, which they cannot easily get away. So, one thing is very clear that the new bill has looked into this provision extremely carefully. Although not mandatory, but a binding obligation is on the board to make sure that the company will spend on the CSR.

Q: After the Companies Bill being passed, what are the most common queries that you are facing from clients at this point in time? What are they most worried about in terms of adherence going forward?

A: The first query, which we are facing from the client, is about the CSR. The second is about the Memorandum of Association. They are also worried about the roles and responsibility of the independent directors. The fourth concern, which they are discussing, is the provisions pertaining to investor protection mechanism.

There is one very important provision. If you are obtaining the credit facilities and loan from the bank, if incorrect information is provided, it puts a heavy onus on the board. The queries are also directed towards the roles and responsibility of the independent directors. What is the responsibility, whether they are going to be liable, to what extent they will be responsible? The independent directors attend for the sake of attending and there is no positive contribution. For example, when you look into the various examples, you deal with the frauds in the corporate governance or the problems arising in the corporate governance and the independent directors playing just a role on the paper.

Q: If you can make it a little more specific for us, only touching on independent directors. I understand that clause 184 of the Bill requires way more disclosures compared to clause 299 of the Act, the one that is going out. What those disclosures are? How much more onerous they are? Are there are any stiffer penalties? How does the life of independent director become tougher?

A: Earlier, it was just pertaining to conflict of interest where they were just required to disclose only in the limited area. But now it has to be voluntarily. When they are facing a particular situation or resolution is placed before the board, the obligation is now on the independent directors to voluntarily provide every possible information, which can come into way of conflict with the board or where he is an interested party. So, the first obligation upon the independent director is about providing the information.

The second is about that if it is found that it has not given the proper disclosure and suppose if there is an action by the shareholders then there is also the penalty and provisions of special court. So, all in all, basically the disclosures are required from independent directors or the directors. The conflict of interest is concerned, that has been widened. The voluntary obligation, which has been cast, is very important because they do not wait, but they have to give upfront all the information.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES 2009 Ministry of Corporate Affairs Government of India


CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES
2009
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Government of India

Fundamental Principle

Core Elements:
Each  business  entity  should  formulate  a  CSR  policy  to  guide  its strategic planning and provide a roadmap for its CSR initiatives, which should be an integral part of overall business policy and aligned with its business goals. The policy should be framed with the participation of various level executives and should be approved by the Board.

The CSR Policy should normally cover following core elements:

1. Care for all Stakeholders: 
The  companies  should  respect  the  interests  of,  and  be  responsive towards all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, project affected people, society at large etc. and create value for all of them. They should develop mechanism to actively engage with all stakeholders, inform them of inherent risks and mitigate them where they occur.  

2. Ethical functioning: 
Their  governance  systems  should  be  underpinned  by  Ethics, Transparency and Accountability. They should not engage in business practices that are abusive, unfair, corrupt or anti-competitive.

3. Respect for Workers' Rights and Welfare: 
Companies  should  provide  a  workplace  environment  that  is  safe, hygienic  and  humane  and  which  upholds  the  dignity  of  employees. They  should  provide  all  employees  with  access  to  training  and development of necessary skills for career advancement, on an equal and  non-discriminatory  basis.  They  should  uphold  the  freedom  of association  and  the  effective  recognition  of  the  right  to  collective bargaining  of labour, have an effective grievance redressal  system, should  not  employ  child  or  forced  labour  and  provide  and maintain equality of opportunities without any discrimination on any grounds in recruitment and during employment.

4. Respect for Human Rights: 
Companies should respect human rights for all and avoid complicity with human rights abuses by them or by third party. 

5. Respect for Environment: 
Companies  should  take  measures  to  check  and  prevent  pollution; recycle, manage and reduce waste, should manage natural resources in a sustainable manner and ensure optimal use of resources like land and  water,  should proactively  respond  to  the  challenges  of  climate change by adopting cleaner production methods, promoting efficient use of energy and environment friendly technologies. 

6. Activities for Social and Inclusive Development: 
Depending  upon  their  core  competency  and  business  interest, companies  should  undertake  activities  for  economic  and  social development of communities and geographical areas, particularly in the vicinity of their operations. These could include: education, skill building for  livelihood  of  people,  health,  cultural  and  social  welfare  etc., particularly targeting at disadvantaged sections of society.

Implementation Guidance:
1.  The  CSR  policy  of  the  business  entity  should  provide  for  an implementation strategy which  should include  identification of projects/activities, setting measurable physical targets with timeframe, organizational mechanism  and  responsibilities,  time  schedules  and monitoring.  Companies may  partner  with  local authorities,  business associations  and  civil  society/non-government  organizations.  They may  influence  the  supply  chain  for  CSR  initiative  and  motivate employees for voluntary effort for social development. They may evolve a  system  of  need  assessment  and  impact  assessment  while undertaking CSR activities in a particular area. Independent evaluation may also be undertaken for  selected projects/activities from time to time.

2. Companies should allocate specific amount in their budgets for CSR activities.  This  amount  may  be  related  to  profits  after  tax,  cost  of planned CSR activities or any other suitable parameter.

3.  To  share  experiences  and  network  with  other  organizations  the company  should  engage  with  well  established  and  recognized programmes/platforms which encourage responsible business practices and CSR activities. This would help companies to improve on their CSR strategies and effectively project the image of being socially responsible.

4.  The  companies  should  disseminate  information  on  CSR  policy, activities and progress in a structured manner to all their stakeholders and the public at large through their website, annual reports, and other 
communication media.

Document of Government of India


Corporate Social Responsibility in India


The evolution of corporate social responsibility in India refers to changes over time in India of the cultural norms of corporations' engagement of corporate social responsibility (CSR), with CSR referring to way that businesses are managed to bring about an overall positive impact on the communities, cultures, societies and environments in which they operate. The fundamentals of CSR rest on the fact that not only public policy but even corporates should be responsible enough to address social issues. Thus companies should deal with the challenges and issues looked after to a certain extent by the states.

Among other countries India has one of the most richest traditions of CSR. Much has been done in recent years to make Indian Entrepreneurs aware of social responsibility as an important segment of their business activity but CSR in India has yet to receive widespread recognition. If this goal has to be realised then the CSR approach of coroporates has to be in line with their attitudes towards mainstream business- companies setting clear objectives, undertaking potential investments, measuring and reporting performance publicly.

The history of CSR in India has its four phases which run parallel to India's historical development and has resulted in different approaches towards CSR. However the phases are not static and the features of each phase may overlap other phases.

The First Phase

In the first phase charity and philanthropy were the main drivers of CSR. Culture, religion, family values and tradition and industrialization had an influential effect on CSR. In the pre-industrialization period, which lasted till 1850, wealthy merchants shared a part of their wealth with the wider society by way of setting up temples for a religious cause. Moreover, these merchants helped the society in getting over phases of famine and epidemics by providing food from their godowns and money and thus securing an integral position in the society.

With the arrival of colonial rule in India from 1850s onwards, the approach towards CSR changed. The industrial families of the 19th century such as Tata, Godrej, Bajaj, Modi, Birla, Singhania were strongly inclined towards economic as well as social considerations. However it has been observed that their efforts towards social as well as industrial development were not only driven by selfless and religious motives but also influenced by caste groups and political objectives.

The Second Phase

In the second phase, during the independence movement, there was increased stress on Indian Industrialists to demonstrate their dedication towards the progress of the society. This was when Mahatma Gandhi introduced the notion of "trusteeship", according to which the industry leaders had to manage their wealth so as to benefit the common man. "I desire to end capitalism almost, if not quite, as much as the most advanced socialist. But our methods differ. My theory of trusteeship is no make-shift, certainly no camouflage. I am confident that it will survive all other theories." This was Gandhi's words which highlights his argument towards his concept of "trusteeship". Gandhi's influence put pressure on various Industrialists to act towards building the nation and its socio-economic development. According to Gandhi, Indian companies were supposed to be the "temples of modern India". Under his influence businesses established trusts for schools and colleges and also helped in setting up training and scientific institutions. The operations of the trusts were largely in line with Gandhi's reforms which sought to abolish untouchability, encourage empowerment of women and rural development.

The Third Phase

The third phase of CSR (1960–80) had its relation to the element of "mixed economy", emergence of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and laws relating labour and environmental standards. During this period the private sector was forced to take a backseat. The public sector was seen as the prime mover of development. Because of the stringent legal rules and regulations surrounding the activities of the private sector, the period was described as an "era of command and control". The policy of industrial licensing, high taxes and restrictions on the private sector led to corporate malpractices. This led to enactment of legislation regarding corporate governance, labour and environmental issues. PSUs were set up by the state to ensure suitable distribution of resources (wealth, food etc.) to the needy. However the public sector was effective only to a certain limited extent. This led to shift of expectation from the public to the private sector and their active involvement in the socio-economic development of the country became absolutely necessary. In 1965 Indian academicians, politicians and businessmen set up a national workshop on CSR aimed at reconciliation. They emphasized upon transparency, social accountability and regular stakeholder dialogues. In spite of such attempts the CSR failed to catch steam.

The Fourth Phase

In the fourth phase (1980 until the present) Indian companies started abandoning their traditional engagement with CSR and integrated it into a sustainable business strategy. In 1990s the first initiation towards globalization and economic liberalization were undertaken. Controls and licensing system were partly done away with which gave a boost to the economy the signs of which are very evident today. Increased growth momentum of the economy helped Indian companies grow rapidly and this made them more willing and able to contribute towards social cause. Globalization has transformed India into an important destination in terms of production and manufacturing bases of TNCs are concerned. As Western markets are becoming more and more concerned about and labour and environmental standards in the developing countries, Indian companies who export and produce goods for the developed world need to pay a close attention to compliance with the international standards. 

Current State of CSR in India

As discussed above, CSR is not a new concept in India. Ever since their inception, corporates like the Tata Group, the Aditya Birla Group, and Indian Oil Corporation, to name a few, have been involved in serving the community.Through donations and charity events, many other organizations have been doing their part for the society. The basic objective of CSR in these days is to maximize the company's overall impact on the society and stakeholders. CSR policies, practices and programs are being comprehensively integrated by an increasing number of companies throughout their business operations and processes. A growing number of corporates feel that CSR is not just another form of indirect expense but is important for protecting the goodwill and reputation, defending attacks and increasing business competitiveness.

Companies have specialised CSR teams that formulate policies, strategies and goals for their CSR programs and set aside budgets to fund them. These programs are often determined by social philosophy which have clear objectives and are well defined and are aligned with the mainsteeam business. The programs are put into practice by the employees who are crucial to this process. CSR programs ranges from community development to development in education, environment and healthcare etc.

For example, a more comprehensive method of development is adopted by some corporations such as Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Maruti Suzuki India Limited, and Hindustan Unilever Limited. Provision of improved medical and sanitation facilities, building schools and houses, and empowering the villagers and in process making them more self-reliant by providing vocational training and a knowledge of business operations are the facilities that these corporations focus on.Many of the companies are helping other peoples by providing them good standard of living.

On the other hand, the CSR programs of corporations like GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals’ focus on the health aspect of the community. They set up health camps in tribal villages which offer medical check-ups and treatment and undertake health awareness programs. Some of the non-profit organizations which carry out health and education programs in backward areas are to a certain extent funded by such corporations.

Also Corporates increasingly join hands with Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and use their expertise in devising programs which address wider social problems. For example, a lot of work is being undertaken to rebuild the lives of the tsunami affected victims. This is exclusively undertaken by SAP India in partnership with Hope Foundation, an NGO that focuses mainly on bringing about improvement in the lives of the poor and needy . The SAP Labs Center of HOPE in Bangalore was started by this venture which looks after the food, clothing, shelter and medical care of street children.

CSR has gone through many phases in India. The ability to make a significant difference in the society and improve the overall quality of life has clearly been proven by the corporates. Not one but all corporates should try and bring about a change in the current social situation in India in order to have an effective and lasting solution to the social woes . Partnerships between companies, NGOs and the government should be facilitated so that a combination of their skills such as expertise, strategic thinking, manpower and money to initiate extensive social change will put the socio-economic development of India on a fast track.

Corporate Social Responsibility


In today's economic and social environment, issues related to social responsibility and sustainability are gaining more and more importance, especially in the business sector. Business goals are inseparable from the societies and environments within which they operate. Whilst short-term economic gain can be pursued, the failure to account for longer-term social and environmental impacts makes those business practices unsustainable.



Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be understood as a management concept and a process that integrates social and environmental concerns in business operations and a company’s interactions with the full range of its stakeholders.

The Global Compact asks companies to embrace, support and enact, within their sphere of influence, a set of core values in the areas of human rights, labor standards, the environment and anti-corruption.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR, also called corporate conscience, corporate citizenship, social performance, or sustainable responsible business/ Responsible Business) is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model. 

CSR policy functions as a built-in, self-regulating mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards, and international norms. 

CSR is a process with the aim to embrace responsibility for the company's actions and encourage a positive impact through its activities on the environment, consumers, employees, communities, stakeholders and all other members of the public sphere who may also be considered as stakeholders.

History

The term "corporate social responsibility" came into common use in the late 1960s and early 1970s after many multinational corporations formed the term stakeholder, meaning those on whom an organization's activities have an impact. It was used to describe corporate owners beyond shareholders as a result of an influential book by R. Edward Freeman, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach in 1984.

Approaches

Common approach to CSR is corporate philanthropy. This includes monetary donations and aid given to local and non-local nonprofit organizations and communities, including donations in areas such as the arts, education, housing, health, social welfare, and the environment, among others, but excluding political contributions and commercial sponsorship of events.

Some organizations do not like a philanthropy-based approach as it might not help build on the skills of local populations, whereas community-based development generally leads to more sustainable development.

Another approach is garnering increasing corporate responsibility interest. This is called Creating Shared Value, or CSV. The shared value model is based on the idea that corporate success and social welfare are interdependent. A business needs a healthy, educated workforce, sustainable resources and adept government to compete effectively. For society to thrive, profitable and competitive businesses must be developed and supported to create income, wealth, tax revenues, and opportunities for philanthropy. CSV received global attention in the Harvard Business Review article Strategy & Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.

A number of reporting guidelines or standards have been developed to serve as frameworks for social accounting, auditing and reporting which includes 

The ISO 14000 environmental management standard and The United Nations Global Compact requires companies to communicate on their progress or to produce a Communication on Progress, (COP), and to describe the company's implementation of the Compact's ten universal principles. 

Main themes of CSR are Risk management, Brand differentiation, License to operate, Ethical consumerism, Social awareness and education, Laws and regulation, Stakeholder priorities..

Basically, CSR means that a company's business model should be socially responsible and environmentally sustainable. By socially responsible, it means that the company's activities should benefit the society and by environmentally sustainable it means that the activities of the company should not harm the environment.
But currently what we can see is that there is an outburst of enthusiasm for environmental causes only. For example, controlling pollution, global warming, deforestation, mitigate carbon emissions, etc. Whereas it can be said that the same enthusiasm is not seen for social welfare. 

For further study:




Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Eco-Labeling


Green Stickers on consumer goods have been evolving since the 1970s. The main drivers have been energy and fuel consumption. These stickers first started appearing on major appliances after government agencies in the United States and Canada legislated their requirement. Manufacturers are also required to meet minimum standards of energy use. The automobile industry in North America is required to meet a minimum emissions standard. This led to fuel efficiency labels being placed on new automobiles sold. The major appliance manufactures were required to use standard testing practices and place clear labels on products. The International Organization for Standardization has developed standards for addressing environmental labelling with the ISO 14000 family which grew out of ISO's commitment to support the objective of sustainable development discussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, in Rio de Janeiro, in 1992.




Green Labelling worldwide is moving beyond traditional country borders. Most of these initiatives are voluntary Eco-labels, however there is an initiative under way in North America to broaden the scope of Green Stickers to include other consumer goods.

Ecolabels and Green Stickers are labelling systems for food and consumer products. Ecolabels are often voluntary, but green stickers are mandated by law in North America for major appliances and automobiles. They are a form of sustainability measurement directed at consumers, intended to make it easy to take environmental concerns into account when shopping. Some labels quantify pollution or energy consumption by way of index scores or units of measurement; others simply assert compliance with a set of practices or minimum requirements for sustainability or reduction of harm to the environment.

Ecolabelling systems exist for both food and consumer products. Both systems were started by NGOs but nowadays the European Union have legislation for the rules of ecolabelling and also have their own ecolabels, one for food and one for consumer products. At least for food, the ecolabel is nearly identical with the common NGO definition of the rules for ecolabelling. Trust in the label is an issue for consumers, as manufacturers or manufacturing associations could set up "rubber stamp" labels to greenwash their products.



There are several logo types:

General claims

Such as “chlorine free”, “eco-friendly” or other generic terms. This type is most likely guilty of greenwashing and is not an independently validated claim.

Type I Ecolabel

Provide a 'seal of approval' where a licence is given to use the ecolabel logo on products which have met the specification, been independently audited and consider life-cycle environmental impacts over the whole life-cycle. Type I ecolabels, such as the Nordic Ecolabel, are thus an indicator of overall environmental preference in that product category.

Type II Ecolabel

These are self-declarations, not involving independent audit (e.g. the 'recyclable/recycled' Mobius loop symbol)

Type III Ecolabel

Type III ecolabels are operated by third parties and involve independent audits which includes information about the environmental impacts associated with a product or service, such as raw material acquisition, energy use and efficiency, content of materials and chemical substances, emissions to air, soil and water and waste generation. It also includes product and company information.

The international EPD® system is a member of the Global Type III Environmental Product Declarations Network and is a standardized (ISO 14025/TR) and Life Cycle Assessment. (LCA) based tool to communicate the environmental performance of a product or system.




Principles of Clean Production


“ In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainly shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.”
—Rio Declaration 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development

The precautionary principle is a new paradigm of decision-making. It is based on:

Taking precautionary action before scientific certainty of cause and effect;
Setting goals;
Seeking out and evaluating alternatives;
Shifting burdens of proof; and
Developing more democratic and thorough decision-making criteria and methods.

Ref:
http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=principles+of+clean+production&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDcQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.financingcp.org%2Fdocs%2FCP1_Slides.ppt&ei=qJ0HUb-YN4zirAe6o4CADQ&usg=AFQjCNEBVqztlG07f3kItiWw4wz5EylLbg&bvm=bv.41524429,d.bmk

http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=principles+of+clean+production&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0CFgQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unep.fr%2Fshared%2Fpublications%2Fcdrom%2FDTIx0899xPA%2Fsession02_Cleaner_Production.ppt&ei=qJ0HUb-YN4zirAe6o4CADQ&usg=AFQjCNGG5W7vSY66YxDTJMX5i1Z1YoXV-g&bvm=bv.41524429,d.bmk

http://www.cleanproduction.org/library/Factsheet1_Clean_Production.pdf

http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/9750_0256406e.pdf

http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/Documents/LPSDP/BPEMCleanerProduction.pdf




The Principles of Clean Production

Production processes and products designed with little concern for their environmental impacts frequently damage human health and that of our communities, and wreak havoc upon the earth's fragile ecosystems. The resulting environmental degradation is global and all people are affected. But the burden of environmental degradation falls disproportionately on the poor, politically oppressed and people of color.

To end and reverse these impacts requires a commitment to clean production. Achieving clean production requires continuous application of precaution, prevention, democracy, and producer responsibility for impacts caused by production processes and products.

Preventative Approach
Prevention means reducing the toxicity (detoxification) and material intensity (dematerialization) of products and production processes.

Prevention in production processes is achieved through in-plant changes in processes, materials, and operations management.  Implementing prevention techniques requires using less or non-toxic materials, renewable rather than non-renewable materials and reducing energy and water use.

Prevention in products is achieved—across their life cycle—through changes in product design and end-of-life product management.  Products designed using a preventative approach:

1. use no persistent, bioaccumulative, carcinogenic, neurotoxic, teratogenic, or developmentally toxic chemicals, or genetically modified organisms

2. are reused, recycled, or composted at the end of their lifecycle

3. are manufactured using the cleanest and safest materials and processes.

Preventative techniques do not shift the risks between environmental media, workers and citizens.

Right to Know
Citizens and workers have the right-to-know and understand the hazards and environmental impacts of materials used in manufacturing processes and contained in products and their packaging.

This requires producers to report the use of all materials (including their hazards), energy, and water used in production to workers, citizens, and governments and to include on products a label that lists materials in production, contained in the products and used in its packaging (including their potential hazards).

Right to Participate in Decisions Affecting Public, Occupation, and Environmental Health
Citizens and workers have a fundamental right to participate in the decisions that affect their health, life and environment. This includes a right to prior informed consent before exposure to potentially dangerous activities or products.   Such participation can be achieved through an open meeting process and the preparation of Environmental and Human Health Impact Statements prior to constructing production, recycling and disposal facilities and producing or importing new products.

Precautionary Approach
When an activity or material creates the potential for serious or irreversible harm to the environment or human health, producers must take measures to prevent harm from occurring, avoid the activity or cease using the material.  In these cases precaution entails developing and using safer alternatives before a casual link has been established by absolutely clear scientific evidence.  To continue an activity in the face of serious harm, producers should be responsible for demonstrating that no safer processes or materials are available to perform the task.

The Responsibility of Producers - Extended Producer Responsibility
Manufacturers should be responsible for the environmental and health impacts caused by their products and production throughout their lifecycles.  Extended producer responsibility involves four forms of responsibility: physical responsibility, economic responsibility, product liability, and informative liability.

Physical responsibility means producers are held accountable for a product once a consumer finishes using it.  The physical management of a product might entail collecting, processing, composting, treating, or disposing of products.

Economic responsibility means producers must pay for the physical management of a product after a consumer finishes using the product.

Product liability means producers take a responsibility for environmental damages caused by a product during production, use or disposal.

Informative liability means producers must provide information on the materials used to produce and contained in a product and the environmental and human health effects of these materials throughout the product’s life cycle.

Citizen Responsibility for Sustainable Consumption
Citizens, especially affluent citizens have a responsibility to consume in a way that is sustainable. This entails limiting consumption of short-lived, non-essential products; reducing the use of products that consume large amounts of resources or contain or use toxic substances in their production; increasing the use of durable, repairable, and less-toxic products; decreasing reliance on polluting forms of transportation; increasing “sharing” of durable products; and reusing; composting; and recycling products at the end of their useful life.

Product Stewardship




Product stewardship is an approach, a concept, a policy for managing the impacts of different products and materials. It acknowledges that those involved in producing, selling, using and disposing of products have a shared responsibility to ensure that those products or materials are managed in a way that reduces their impact, throughout their lifecycle, on the environment and on human health and safety.

It is a product-centered approach to environmental protection also known as extended product responsibility (EPR) It calls on those in the product lifecycle—manufacturers, retailers, users, and disposers—to share responsibility for reducing the environmental impacts of products. 

Product stewardship recognizes that product manufacturers must take on new responsibilities to reduce the environmental footprint of their products. However, real change cannot always be achieved by producers acting alone: retailers, consumers, and the existing waste management infrastructure need to help to provide the most workable and cost-effective solutions. Solutions and roles will vary from one product system to another.






  • Manufacturers and Product Stewardship


In most cases, manufacturers have the greatest ability, and therefore the greatest responsibility, to reduce the environmental impacts of their products. Companies that are accepting the challenge are recognizing that product stewardship also represents a substantial business opportunity. By rethinking their products, their relationships with the supply chain, and the ultimate customer, some manufacturers are dramatically increasing their productivity, reducing costs, fostering product and market innovation, and providing customers with more value at less environmental impact. Reducing use of toxic substances, designing for reuse and recyclability, and creating takeback programs are just a few of the many opportunities for companies to become better environmental stewards of their products. 


  • Retailers and Product Stewardship

As the sector with the closest ties to consumers, retailers are one of the gateways to product stewardship. From preferring product providers who offer greater environmental performance, to educate the consumer on how to choose environmentally preferable products, to enable consumers to return of products for recycling, retailers are an integral part of the product stewardship revolution.


  • Consumers and Product Stewardship

All products are designed with a consumer in mind. Ultimately, it is the consumer who makes the choice between competing products and who must use and dispose of products responsibly.  Without consumer engagement in product stewardship, there is no “closing  the loop.” Consumers must make responsible buying choices which consider environmental impacts. They must use products safely and efficiently. Finally, they must take the extra steps to recycle products that they no longer need.


  • State and Local Governments and Product Stewardship

Solid waste programs should be focussed for primary management at the state and local level. Thus, state and local governments are essential to fostering product stewardship, especially as it relates to waste management. There is a growing need for solid waste master plans, and undertaking cooperative efforts with manufacturers, retailers and others to increase recycling of discarded products.  

Need




  • Coordination and collaboration among states, local governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations on these issues. 



  • Incentivize the development of products with stronger environmental attributes.



  • To address the full range of product lifecycle issues, the Product Stewardship program also works with other EPA programs, as well as various public- and private-sector stakeholders, to promote "greener" design, greener product standards, and greener purchasing practices.



  • Planning today.......for a greener tomorrow

Like it or not, we are all part of a voracious consumer culture. Keeping recyclables out of landfill reduces the need to create new landfill sites. Reusing these recycled materials consumes less energy than creating these products from raw material. Many products become toxic at the end of their lifecycle. By committing to responsibly recycle these products, and by doing our part and returning them to collection sites, we can help ensure our future is sustainable for generations to come.

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

The Silent Spring - Rachel Carson


Silent Spring is a book written by Rachel Carson and published by Houghton Mifflin on September 27, 1962.The book is widely credited with helping launch the contemporary American environmental movement.

The New Yorker started serializing Silent Spring in June 1962, and it was published in book form (with illustrations by Lois and Louis Darling) by Houghton Mifflin on Sept. 27. When the book Silent Spring was published, Rachel Carson was already a well-known writer on natural history, but had not previously been a social critic. The book was widely read—especially after its selection by the Book-of-the-Month Club and the New York Times best-seller list—and inspired widespread public concerns with pesticides and pollution of the environment. Silent Spring facilitated the ban of the pesticide DDT in 1972 in the United States.

The book documented detrimental effects of pesticides on the environment, particularly on birds. Carson accused the chemical industry of spreading disinformation, and public officials of accepting industry claims uncritically.

Silent Spring has been featured in many lists of the best nonfiction books of the twentieth century. Most recently, Silent Spring was named one of the 25 greatest science books of all time by the editors of Discover Magazine.A follow-up book, Beyond Silent Spring,co-authored by H.F. van Emden and David Peakall, was published in 1996.




Get the Book here:


Great Smog of 1952 - London


Smog had become a frequent part of London life, but nothing quite compared to the smoke-laden fog that shrouded the capital from Friday 5 December to Tuesday 9 December 1952.

Early on 5 December in the London area, the sky was clear, winds were light and the air near the ground was moist.

Accordingly, conditions were ideal for the formation of radiation fog.

The sky was clear, so a net loss of long-wave radiation occurred and the ground cooled. The moist air in contact with the ground cooled to its dew-point temperature and condensation occurred.

Cool air drained katabatically into the Thames Valley. Beneath the inversion of the anticyclone, the very light wind stirred the saturated air upwards to form a layer of fog 100–200 metres deep. Along with the water droplets of the fog, the atmosphere beneath the inversion contained the smoke from innumerable chimneys in the London area and farther afield. Elevated spots such as Hampstead Heath were above the fog and grime. From there, the hills of Surrey and Kent could be seen.

During the day on 5 December, the fog was not especially dense and generally possessed a dry, smoky character. When nightfall came, however, the fog thickened. Visibility dropped to a few metres. The following day, the sun was too low in the sky to make much of an impression on the fog. That night and on the Sunday and Monday nights, the fog again thickened. In many parts of London, it was impossible at night for pedestrians to find their way, even in familiar districts. In the Isle of Dogs, the visibility was at times nil. The fog there was so thick that people could not see their own feet! Even in the drier thoroughfares of central London, the fog was exceptionally thick. Not until 9 December did it clear. In central London, the visibility remained below 500 metres continuously for 114 hours and below 50 metres continuously for 48 hours. At Heathrow Airport, visibility remained below ten metres for almost 48 hours from the morning of 6 December.

Huge quantities of impurities were released into the atmosphere during the period in question. On each day during the foggy period, the following amounts of pollutants were emitted: 1,000 tonnes of smoke particles, 2,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, 140 tonnes of hydrochloric acid and 14 tonnes of fluorine compounds. In addition, and perhaps most dangerously, 370 tonnes of sulphur dioxide were converted into 800 tonnes of sulphuric acid. At London's County Hall, the concentration of smoke in the air increased from 0.49 milligrams per cubic metre on 4 December to 4.46 on the 7th and 8th.

The infamous fog of December 1952 has come to be known as 'The Great Smog'; the term 'smog' being a portmanteau word meaning 'fog intensified by smoke'. The term was coined almost half a century earlier, by HA Des Voeux, who first used it in 1905 to describe the conditions of fuliginous (sooty) fog that occurred all too often over British urban areas. It was popularised in 1911 when Des Voeux presented to the Manchester Conference of the Smoke Abatement League of Great Britain a report on the deaths that occurred in Glasgow and Edinburgh in the Autumn of 1909 as a consequence of smoke-laden fogs.

Legislation followed the Great Smog of 1952 in the form of the City of London (Various Powers) Act of 1954 and the Clean Air Acts of 1956 and 1968. These Acts banned emissions of black smoke and decreed that residents of urban areas and operators of factories must convert to smokeless fuels. As these residents and operators were necessarily given time to convert, however, fogs continued to be smoky for some time after the Act of 1956 was passed. In 1962, for example, 750 Londoners died as a result of a fog, but nothing on the scale of the 1952 Great Smog has ever occurred again.

Note
An anticyclone (that is, opposite to a cyclone) is a weather phenomenon defined by the United States' National Weather Service's glossary as "large-scale circulation of winds around a central region of high atmospheric pressure, clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere, counterclockwise in the Southern Hemisphere".Effects of surface-based anticyclones include clearing skies as well as cooler, drier air. Fog can also form overnight within a region of higher pressure. Mid-tropospheric systems, such as the subtropical ridge, deflect tropical cyclones around their periphery and cause a temperature inversion inhibiting free convection near their center, building up surface-based haze under their base. Anticyclones aloft can form within warm core lows, such as tropical cyclones, due to descending cool air from the backside of upper troughs, such as polar highs, or from large scale sinking, such as the subtropical ridge.

In meteorology, an inversion is a deviation from the normal change of an atmospheric property with altitude. It almost always refers to a "temperature inversion", i.e., an increase in temperature with height, or to the layer ("inversion layer") within which such an increase occurs.
An inversion can lead to pollution such as smog being trapped close to the ground, with possible adverse effects on health. An inversion can also suppress convection by acting as a "cap". If this cap is broken for any of several reasons, convection of any moisture present can then erupt into violent thunderstorms. Temperature inversion can notoriously result in freezing rain in cold climates.

For further study:

http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/great_smog.html



Thursday, 3 January 2013

Coliform Group Bacteria


What are Coliform Group Bacteria?
Coliforms consist of a related group of bacteria species.

Where are they found?
Two Distinct Sources:
• Human and Animal waste (fecal in origin)- septic systems, sewage, animal yards, etc.
• Within the environment ("vegetative")- soil, vegetation, sediment, insects etc.
Why test for Coliforms?
• Coliforms are "indicator" organisms associated with bacteriologically polluted water.
• Their presence in finished water is indicative of contamination & is not tolerated.
• Extensively studied - their presence may be associated with disease causing organisms.
• Coliform testing does not indicate the presence of specific chemical contaminants
such as pesticides, metals, solvents, gasoline, nitrates, etc.
Differentiating Coliform Group Bacteria
• Total Coliform Test-theoretically indicates the presence of all coliform group
bacteria, both vegetative and fecal in origin
• E. coli - a coliform species found in the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals.
- its presence can be indicative of fresh pollution from human or animal waste
- though normally benign, some E. coli strains may be deadly (0157:H7)
• Fecal Coliform-those that ferment lactose & produce gas at 44.5 +/-0.20C within 24
+/- 2 hours

• Consist of various genera and species of coliforms that are specifically associated
with human or animal waste.
- includes E. coli as well as others
- Fecal Coliform testing can help pinpoint the source of pollution in an aquifer
or watershed and is used to monitor the disinfection of sanitary waste water before discharge.
Coliform Group Bacteria:
• Total Coliforms:
Escherichia, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Citrobacter
• Fecal Coliforms:
Escherichia, Klebsiella, Citrobacter (60% to 90% of total coliforms are fecal coliforms) 90%+ of fecal coliforms are Escherichia (usually E. coli)